What has happened to desktop icons in rawhide?
christoph.wickert at googlemail.com
Sun Jan 23 20:10:32 UTC 2011
Am Sonntag, den 23.01.2011, 20:01 +0100 schrieb drago01:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Christoph Wickert
> <christoph.wickert at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 23.01.2011, 22:42 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> >> On 01/23/2011 09:58 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Also keep in mind that there are other "first-class desktop
> >> > environment". Moblin is just as much a GNOME based first-class desktop
> >> > environment as gnome-shell, just for a different use-case (Netbooks).
> >> I don't think that's the case. GNOME Shell is a integral part of GNOME
> >> 3. Moblin upstream seems only interested in being a complete OS and
> >> haven't cooperated well with other projects which want to include Moblin
> >> as a alternative UI in their distributions. Conman, trademark
> >> shenanigans etc. I understand the point you are trying to make but
> >> Moblin is really a poor example to pick.
> > I agree it's a poor example and Ubuntu's Unity is yet another one
> > because they don't cooperate well ether. Nevertheless all these are user
> > interfaces based on GNOME technology. They are not default and seriously
> > shouldn't be
> gnome-shell *is* the default gnome user interface starting with gnome3.
I didn't claim something different. I said that *Unity and Moblin* are
not default, but regardless of what is default, we shouldn't force users
to install something they ether don't want to use or cannot even use.
More information about the test