[Test-Announce] 2011-07-15 @ 17:00 UTC - F16 Alpha blocker bug review #1

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 07/14/2011 11:28 AM, James Laska wrote:
> Long story short, I agree it makes sense to keep this separate from the
> blocker process.

Agreed as well

The sysv to systemd feature is a special case and should not be mixed 
into the standard QA workflow.

The QA community should be aware of how important that it is that we 
convert and ship as many native systemd unit in one release cycle and 
potential issues we have to deal with if we dont and should perhaps help 
things move along anyway that said it's up to Fesco to evaluate on per 
sysv legacy init script bases when the time comes if they should be 
blockers or not since there might be substantial code writing/rework 
that needs to be done to properly integrate that service to systemd  
which for example might be the case with Audit.

JBG