2011-07-22 - F16 Alpha blocker bug review #2 - recap
James Laska
jlaska at redhat.com
Fri Jul 22 18:52:16 UTC 2011
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f16-blocker-review.2011-07-22-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f16-blocker-review.2011-07-22-17.00.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f16-blocker-review.2011-07-22-17.00.log.html
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (jlaska, 17:00:17)
* Basic information (jlaska, 17:03:23)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(jlaska, 17:03:26)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(jlaska, 17:03:30)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers
(jlaska, 17:03:35)
* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722963 (jlaska, 17:05:36)
* TypeError: %d format: a number is required, not str (jlaska,
17:05:46)
* AGREED: 722963 - AcceptedBlocker for F16Final - appears to involve
manual partition scenarios where the partition is not within the
size limits for the format selected (jlaska, 17:11:31)
* Patch out for review on anaconda-devel, likely will be fixed well
before F16Final (jlaska, 17:11:45)
* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723144 (jlaska, 17:12:03)
* anaconda 16.12 crashed after the partition process (jlaska,
17:12:09)
* ACTION: jlaska will propose rewording Alpha release criteria for
paritioning to include [X] Use LVM? (jlaska, 17:14:34)
* AGREED: 723144 - AcceptedBlocker - Impacts default partition
scenario and Alpha partition criteria (jlaska, 17:15:42)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723345 (jlaska, 17:16:35)
* Rescue mode fails - TypeError: progressWindow() takes exactly 4
arguments (6 given) (jlaska, 17:16:40)
* affects the Alpha criteria - "The rescue mode of the installer must
start successfully and be able to detect and mount an existing
default installation " (jlaska, 17:16:51)
* AGREED: 723345 - AcceptedBlocker for F16Alpha - impacts rescue mode
Alpha criteria (jlaska, 17:18:36)
* Already fixed in anaconda-16.13-1 (jlaska, 17:18:57)
* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723475 (jlaska, 17:19:09)
* anaconda-16.12 - Unable to activate networking in anaconda (stage2)
(jlaska, 17:19:15)
* group debated whether workaround of booting with "asknetwork" is
acceptable for Alpha (jlaska, 17:32:22)
* AGREED: 723475 - unable to determine if workaround is acceptable for
Alpha, review blocker status again next week with more details on
failure (jlaska, 17:40:40)
* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725040 (jlaska, 17:41:17)
* rawhide installs generic-release package, instead of fedora-release
(jlaska, 17:41:21)
* AGREED: 725040 - AcceptedNTH for F16Alpha - leave on proposed
blocker list until we can confirm this does not impact artwork
(jlaska, 17:54:58)
* adamw noted this bug may impact more than just artwork ... further
investigation needed (jlaska, 17:56:15)
* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723526 (jlaska, 17:56:27)
* firstboot always runs even with RUN_FIRSTBOOT=NO in
/etc/sysconfig/firstboot (jlaska, 17:56:40)
* AGREED: 723526 - Need more information to confirm whether bug exists
after a *fresh* install (jlaska, 18:03:40)
* ACTION: need confirmation whether firstboot is activated after a
*fresh* install (jlaska, 18:03:55)
* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718722 (jlaska, 18:04:16)
* Mismatched or corrupt version of stage1/stage2 (jlaska, 18:04:21)
* AGREED: 718722 - AcceptedBlocker for F16Beta, CommonBugs? - only
impacts upgrades from F15 which is covered by beta criteria
(jlaska, 18:09:51)
* pjones plans to investigate and we'll revisit if the severity
increases (jlaska, 18:11:11)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723901 (jlaska, 18:11:14)
* pre-release anaconda compose is disabling 'rawhide' repo ... leaves
no repos available for install (jlaska, 18:11:19)
* likely related to generic-release vs fedora-release troubles
(jlaska, 18:19:27)
* AGREED: 723901 - revisit next meeting - impacts rawhide installs
now, but unclear whether this will affect Branched (f16) media
installs too (jlaska, 18:21:12)
* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690930 (jlaska, 18:21:23)
* microcode_ctl loops, impossible to boot (jlaska, 18:21:34)
* LINK: http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/CompareProviders <-- jlaska might
want to add this to info for the previous bug (pjones, 18:23:57)
* AGREED: 690930 - AcceptedBlocker - bootable AMD systems favored over
intel microcode update support for Alpha ... if no fix available,
re-apply broken fix to allow AMD systems to boot (jlaska, 18:29:00)
* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720034 (jlaska, 18:30:43)
* AGREED: 720034 - request updated status in bug and revisit/retest
before next meeting (jlaska, 18:33:56)
* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714478 (jlaska, 18:34:07)
* CPU lockup during boot (jlaska, 18:35:03)
* AGREED: 714478 - brunowolff confirmed this issue is resolved in
latest rawhide kernel, move to CLOSED (jlaska, 18:37:04)
* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723160 (jlaska, 18:37:18)
* Gnome-shell presents enormous warning dialog (jlaska, 18:37:23)
* Unclear on impact, could be bad if impacts desktop in all VMs
(jlaska, 18:40:25)
* AGREED: More testing of live images needed to determine scope of
failure (jlaska, 18:42:16)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=724928 (jlaska,
18:42:32)
* ACTION: jlaska - draft Alpha criteria to ensure that reboot/shutdown
work as intended (desktop reboot/shutdown already covered in Beta)
(jlaska, 18:46:24)
* AGREED: 724928 - AcceptedBlocker for F16Alpha - tentatively accepted
for pending alpha criteria for proper shutdown/reboot behavior
(jlaska, 18:47:59)
* Open discussion - <your bug here> (jlaska, 18:48:08)
Meeting ended at 18:51:05 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* jlaska will propose rewording Alpha release criteria for paritioning
to include [X] Use LVM?
* need confirmation whether firstboot is activated after a *fresh*
install
* jlaska - draft Alpha criteria to ensure that reboot/shutdown work as
intended (desktop reboot/shutdown already covered in Beta)
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* jlaska
* jlaska will propose rewording Alpha release criteria for paritioning
to include [X] Use LVM?
* jlaska - draft Alpha criteria to ensure that reboot/shutdown work as
intended (desktop reboot/shutdown already covered in Beta)
* **UNASSIGNED**
* need confirmation whether firstboot is activated after a *fresh*
install
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* jlaska (309)
* adamw (145)
* pjones (66)
* tflink (52)
* Viking-Ice (45)
* buggbot (13)
* bcl (12)
* zodbot (4)
* brunowolff (4)
* robatino (2)
* athmane (2)
* nirik (1)
* rbergeron (1)
* satellit_ (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20110722/b8e510f5/attachment.bin
More information about the test
mailing list