Proposed release criteria revisions
awilliam at redhat.com
Mon Mar 28 23:12:48 UTC 2011
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 23:02 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 03/28/2011 10:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Can you *please* stop derailing these threads? I was asking for feedback
> > on the specific proposed changes, not any old random ideas anyone has
> > for changes to the criteria. If you want to propose some changes that
> > are different from mine, please draft them up and start a new thread.
> > It's really disruptive when you just throw a grenade into a different
> > thread like that; you already completely derailed my first attempt to
> > get some feedback on these changes, please don't do it again.
> Yes and I was proposing that you would instead of only include the
> default install that we would include all the *DE spins and any other
> hand out media that get handed out on events so we would cover the
> upgrade path on those as well?
What desktops are considered to block the release is, as I explained the
last time you tried to derail the thread, a bigger issue and not
something we can just unilaterally declare by rewriting a release
criterion. I do _not_ want to get dragged into that tarpit when I'm just
trying to tighten up the existing criteria in a non-controversial way.
> Do you want first to draft your whole proposal than others will review
> that and come up with a different proposal and then we hold a vote on
> QA meeting which proposal will make the change?
If you actually think there's something about my proposed changes that
should be revised, please state specifically what it is and give your
alternative text - not vague stuff but direct quote and an actual
alternative text. Then we can all discuss which is better. If you just
want to propose something different, please start a new thread, and
again, provide a concrete text proposal.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
More information about the test