Proposed release criteria revisions

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 08:41 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 00:40:07 -0700,
>   Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > I agree 'supported' isn't quite the right word, but I think we need some
> > kind of adjective there. I'll try and think of something better.
> 
> Something needs to be said there, as otherwise people will wonder why only
> some of the desktop spins are listed. "Supported" is close to what we mean,
> but the intended nuance might be confusing given what people may assume
> about the what kind of support is implied. But nothing else specific comes
> to mind as a better word.

Provided?

poc