Proposed release criteria revisions
awilliam at redhat.com
Tue Mar 29 19:34:45 UTC 2011
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 15:27 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > "The installer must be able to successfully complete an upgrade
> > installation from a clean, fully updated default installation (from any
> > official install medium) of the previous stable Fedora release, either
> > via preupgrade or by booting to the installer manually. The upgraded
> > system must meet all release criteria"
> Does it make sense to phase this criteria in? Meaning, it would be
> nice-to-have this release, and blocker material next release? I'd have
> to see what testing results, and want to see if the desktop@ team also
> agrees, since they'll be responsible for resolving these issues.
I didn't really see it as a change, more a clarification. In practice
we've always treated it as 'upgrades have to work' in the sense that the
upgraded system must actually run, not just 'the upgrade process must
complete'. So I'm not sure it's necessary.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
More information about the test