since last update system does not boot any more

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:58:22 -0400,
  Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> I thought that enforcing=0 was considered a better option, no, as it
> avoided relabling.  (I would be grateful if someone can either confirm
> or correct that statement.)

Yes, enforcing=0 is a better temporary workaround than selinux=0 because
the latter will force a relabel.