since last update system does not boot any more

Joachim Backes joachim.backes at
Thu Mar 31 16:26:38 UTC 2011

On 03/31/2011 06:12 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:58:22 -0400,
>    Scott Robbins<scottro at>  wrote:
>> I thought that enforcing=0 was considered a better option, no, as it
>> avoided relabling.  (I would be grateful if someone can either confirm
>> or correct that statement.)
> Yes, enforcing=0 is a better temporary workaround than selinux=0 because
> the latter will force a relabel.

I think this plays no role for me because *I* have SELINUX=disabled in 

Joachim Backes <joachim.backes at>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6131 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : 

More information about the test mailing list