QA 'vote' at the go/no-go meetings

[Jon Stanley]

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:

> I hope that's acceptable to all! If not, or anyone has ideas for
> improvement, do say so...

As a formerly very active QA guy, and less so now since I got a new
$DAYJOB, I think that this makes sense, bit I do have minor concerns
over what happens if someone goes and clears the blocker list just
before the meeting for the sake of being able to say that there are
none. I hope that this concern is mostly academic, though :)