QA 'vote' at the go/no-go meetings

James Laska jlaska at redhat.com
Wed May 18 20:00:08 UTC 2011


On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 02:09 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 05/18/2011 02:03 AM, Jon Stanley wrote:
> > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Adam Williamson<awilliam at redhat.com>  wrote:
> >
> >> I hope that's acceptable to all! If not, or anyone has ideas for
> >> improvement, do say so...
> > As a formerly very active QA guy, and less so now since I got a new
> > $DAYJOB, I think that this makes sense, bit I do have minor concerns
> > over what happens if someone goes and clears the blocker list just
> > before the meeting for the sake of being able to say that there are
> > none. I hope that this concern is mostly academic, though :)
> 
> Well let's just hope for our own sake that we will notice if someone 
> suddenly goes and clears out the blocker list out of nowhere..

Yeah that's lame ... I think the likelihood of someone sabotaging the
process is low, and we thankfully have plenty of smart folks involved
monitoring the bugs should anything happen.

Thanks,
James
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20110518/9c6a0660/attachment.bin 


More information about the test mailing list