[Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Final Release Declared GOLD!
awilliam at redhat.com
Fri Nov 4 18:55:00 UTC 2011
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 11:53 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I am concerned with the process as executed not matching the
> > documentation. I'd just like to see a change codified that either
> > allows moving the Go / No-Go meeting when appropriate or just
> > schedule it closer to the readiness meeting.
> I think moving the go/no-go meetings to thursdays and moving the
> readyness meeting to friday is a fine plan. I think our mirroring is in
> shape enough to where if we stage things late thursday or friday
> morning we should be ok.
> If we do this, next cycle we should NOT do any 'two part' go/no-go
Well, what we were thinking of was moving go/no-go without moving
release readiness: there's no real reason there needs to be a whole day
between them, there's no tasks that must happen *after* go/no-go but
*before* release readiness AFAIK, so that whole day just winds up being
dead time. There's no intrinsic reason they can't simply be 1hr apart,
as we did for 16 Final.
So hey, if Friday's okay, we could do 'em both on Friday...
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
More information about the test