Release criteria proposal: i18n criteria

[Akira TAGOH]

Thanks for considering to add a criterion for translations. I'm excited to see that.
Since I missed this post, sorry for not bringing this up earlier.

So I'd clarify this, what exactly "popular languages" is. that sounds like a quite vague and might make a flamewar when any case is raising. So that would be nice if it explicitly has the measurable way what we are fully going to support on the release, such as languages meets over 90% of translations complete at the translation deadline or stats on smolt etc.


----- 元のメッセージ -----
| During Final blocker review meetings, we've come up against a couple
| of
| bugsto do with missing translations that we'd like to consider for
| Final
| blocker status:
| 
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706756
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676488
| 
| however we don't currently actually have any criteria that cover i18n
| (translation) issues. We should probably require some basic level of
| translation to be in place for particularly popular languages. How
| about
| a Final criterion, something like:
| 
| * The installer, bootup and login processes should correctly display
| all
| translations that are available for use
| 
| the intent is that where the translation team has actually provided
| translations of this key content, they should be displayed, but we're
| not going to block on no translations being available for some
| language
| or another.
| 
| Thoughts? Thanks!
| --
| Adam Williamson
| Fedora QA Community Monkey
| IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
| http://www.happyassassin.net
| 
| --
| test mailing list
| test at lists.fedoraproject.org
| To unsubscribe:
| https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
|