F16 Beta Blocker Bug Review #2 Minutes
Michał Piotrowski
mkkp4x4 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 6 20:24:36 UTC 2011
Hi,
2011/9/6 Tim Flink <tflink at redhat.com>:
> Whoops, I forgot to send these out on Friday. Sorry for the delay.
>
> Tim
I looked at that list and have not noticed any "glibc/gcc/* can
corrupt your *" problems. I wonder how much would be safe for me to
update to F16? I use my server for web development - php things,
python, mysql, postgresql, cherokee, apache, git, samba, memcache,
lucene - these are programs that I care most about. I have no pressure
when it comes to use new features, I want to test HekaFS, also Xen
support looks promising. Do I have to use GRUB2 if I upgrade to F16?
> ======================================
> #fedora-bugzappers: F16-blocker-review
> ======================================
>
> Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-09-02/f16-beta-blocker-review-2.2011-09-02-17.00.html
> Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-09-02/f16-beta-blocker-review-2.2011-09-02-17.00.txt
> Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-09-02/f16-beta-blocker-review-2.2011-09-02-17.00.log.html
>
>
> Meeting summary
> ---------------
> * roll call (tflink, 17:01:09)
>
> * Introduction (tflink, 17:05:56)
> * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
> nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
> the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
> bugs. (tflink, 17:06:06)
> * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers
> (tflink, 17:06:25)
> * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
> (tflink, 17:06:39)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728923 (tflink, 17:08:03)
> * Serial console is not configured (tflink, 17:08:13)
> * AGREED: - 728923 - Appears to have been fixed, need confirmation in
> beta TC1. Close once confirmed. (tflink, 17:11:42)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730415 (tflink, 17:11:48)
> * kickstart with user --name=blah results in traceback (tflink,
> 17:11:56)
> * fix for 730415 is in anaconda-16.16 (tflink, 17:22:37)
> * AGREED: - 730415 - RejectedBlocker - There don't seem to be many
> reports of this and discussions of blocker status are purely
> academic for pre-freeze fixes. Fix is in anaconda, needs
> verification (tflink, 17:23:02)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734861 (tflink, 17:23:13)
> * text mode install fails ("you have not created a bootloader stage1
> target device") (tflink, 17:23:23)
> * AGREED: - 734861 - AcceptedBlocker - The installer must be able to
> complete an installation using the text, graphical and VNC
> installation interfaces (tflink, 17:30:46)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735016 (tflink, 17:30:55)
> * reboot halts after preupgrade (tflink, 17:31:03)
> * ACTION: tflink or adamw - update beta release requirement to say
> "both" instead of "either" (tflink, 17:33:43)
> * need more information from reporter (tflink, 17:35:02)
> * requested information: logs from preupgrade. (tflink, 17:37:28)
> * AGREED: - 735016 - AcceptedBlocker - The installer must be able to
> successfully complete an upgrade installation from a clean, fully
> updated default installation (from any official install medium) of
> the previous stable Fedora release, either via preupgrade or by
> booting to the installer manually. The upgraded system must meet all
> release criteria - The bug report is lacking some information, ask
> reporter for more details (tflink, 17:38:55)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731248 (tflink, 17:39:03)
> * [abrt] control-center-3.1.4-1.fc16: Process
> /usr/bin/gnome-control-center was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
> (tflink, 17:39:13)
> * AGREED: - 731248 - AcceptedBlocker - No part of any release-blocking
> desktop's panel (or equivalent) configuration should crash or be
> entirely non-functional on boot of the installed system using
> default installation choices (tflink, 17:45:58)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734286 (tflink, 17:46:06)
> * tboot package was not included in install DVD yet (tflink,
> 17:46:17)
> * AGREED: - 734286 - RejectedBlocker - missing packages for optional
> features are not release blocking issues (tflink, 17:48:25)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734791 (tflink, 17:48:34)
> * Checksum files for Live have wrong name (tflink, 17:48:43)
> * AGREED: - 734791 - AcceptedBlocker - Doesn't hit any release
> criteria but checksum files need to be correct before release
> (tflink, 17:54:31)
> * ACTION: adamw propose release criteria for media checksums and
> checksum filenames (tflink, 17:55:30)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735037 (tflink, 17:55:46)
> * F16-Beta.TC1 - Yum update results in - "Check that the correct key
> URLs are configured for this repository" error message (tflink,
> 17:55:54)
> * AGREED: - 735037 - RejectedBlocker - This was an issue with a
> package that shouldn't have made it in to the F16 repos, has been
> taken care of (tflink, 18:00:44)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734903 (tflink, 18:00:54)
> * having dnsmasq start by default and bind to all interfaces breaks
> libvirt bridging (tflink, 18:01:03)
> * AGREED: - 734903 - RejectedBlocker, AcceptedNTH - While it does
> violate "The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a
> situationwhere the virtual host is running the same release (using
> Fedora's current preferred virtualization technology)" - it is very
> easy to work around and probably only affects upgrades (tflink,
> 18:08:58)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735259 (tflink, 18:09:08)
> * after updating grub2, booting drops me to grub rescue prompt
> (tflink, 18:09:16)
> * AGREED: - 735259 - AcceptedBlocker - The installed system must be
> able to download and install updates with yum and the default
> graphical package manager in all release-blocking desktops (tflink,
> 18:15:37)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731297 (tflink, 18:15:49)
> * gxine-0.5.905-6 can't re-play music after stop playing (tflink,
> 18:15:57)
> * AGREED: - 731297 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedNTH - gxine is only on
> LXDE and is nth since that's not the default DE (tflink, 18:20:00)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735199 (tflink, 18:20:09)
> * "mount -t squashfs" fails (tflink, 18:20:18)
> * ACTION: tflink build boot.iso with new dracut for testing (tflink,
> 18:23:19)
> * AGREED: - 735199 - AcceptedBlocker - The installer must be able to
> complete an installation using the text, graphical and VNC
> installation interfaces (tflink, 18:24:31)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734845 (tflink, 18:24:41)
> * repoclosure failure in 16-Beta.TC1 DVDs (tflink, 18:24:50)
> * AGREED: - 734845 - AcceptedBlocker - (alpha criterion) There must be
> no file conflicts (cases where the files in some packages conflict
> but the packages have explicit Conflicts: tags are acceptable) or
> unresolved package dependencies during a media-based (DVD) install
> (tflink, 18:27:33)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728193 (tflink, 18:28:09)
> * preupgrade cannot retrieve repomd.xml (tflink, 18:28:17)
> * AGREED: - 728193 - AcceptedBlocker - The installer must be able to
> successfully complete an upgrade installation from a clean, fully
> updated default installation (from any official install medium) of
> the previous stable Fedora release, either via preupgrade or by
> booting to the installer manually. The upgraded system must meet all
> release criteria (tflink, 18:30:35)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735013 (tflink, 18:30:45)
> * Having unit B bound or required to unit A and restarting unit A
> while it's active results hang (tflink, 18:30:58)
> * LINK: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39824 is a whole
> lot more readable (pjones, 18:33:44)
> * AGREED: - 735013 - The impact of this bug is unclear and more
> information is needed before making a decision on blocker status
> (tflink, 18:36:50)
> * AGREED: - 731240 - RejectedBlocker - doesn't hit any of the release
> criteria (tflink, 18:41:05)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498207 (tflink, 18:44:04)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735027 (tflink, 18:45:23)
> * Failed to install repository NFSISO default (tflink, 18:45:55)
> * AGREED: - 735027 - CLOSED NOTABUG - the original test case was not
> valid, later testing reproduced another, already tracked issue
> (727522) (tflink, 18:50:28)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678456 (tflink, 18:50:39)
> * GRUB 2 requires os-prober to detect other installed operating
> systems (tflink, 18:50:48)
> * AGREED: - 678456 - AcceptedNTH - This is a final blocker but the fix
> is pretty simple and would be nice to have for beta (tflink,
> 18:53:02)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734959 (tflink, 18:53:15)
> * grub2 needs to require 'which' (tflink, 18:53:25)
> * AGREED: - 734959 - AcceptedNTH - This is a final blocker but the fix
> is pretty simple and would be nice to have for beta (tflink,
> 18:55:14)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669120 (tflink, 18:55:24)
> * Track down and modify PRODUCT string for cleaner syslinux display
> (tflink, 18:55:34)
> * AGREED: - 669120 - AcceptedNTH - Not catastrophic but it looks bad
> and now would be a good time to fix it (tflink, 18:58:00)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734169 (tflink, 18:58:21)
> * Updated syslinux theme for Fedora 16 (tflink, 18:58:30)
> * AGREED: - 734169 - this is a tracker bug, will evaluate dependencies
> on their own (tflink, 19:02:32)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734173 (tflink, 19:02:43)
> * New syslinux theme for F16 Live media (tflink, 19:02:52)
> * AGREED: - 734173 - AcceptedNTH - This is a bit big of a change for
> this late but it would be nice to see this happen. Will create test
> boot.iso and/or live images to test with before TC2 or RC1 (tflink,
> 19:09:03)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734170 (tflink, 19:09:16)
> * New syslinux theme for F16 DVD (tflink, 19:09:25)
> * AGREED: - 734170 - AcceptedNTH - This is a small change and should
> happen with the livecd changes in 734173 (tflink, 19:11:18)
> * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705189 , right?
> (adamw, 19:12:49)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705189 (tflink, 19:13:00)
> * Live install needs a 'reboot' button (tflink, 19:13:11)
> * AGREED: 705189 - AcceptedNTH - A tested fix would be accepted past
> freeze if the anaconda team chooses to move forward with a fix for
> this bug (tflink, 19:19:24)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733808 (tflink, 19:19:52)
> * Installer shrink function fails when asked to shrink an NTFS
> Partition (tflink, 19:20:03)
> * AGREED: 733808 - AcceptedNTH - Resizing partitions isn't supported
> but a small, tested fix would be accepted during freeze if it came
> to that (tflink, 19:28:13)
>
> * open discussion (tflink, 19:28:47)
> * The next blocker bug review meeting will be 2011-09-09 @ 17:00 UTC
> in #fedora-bugzappers (tflink, 19:30:28)
> * brunowolff is still triaging a bug related to the 3.1 kernel and
> raid, he will update as more information is available (tflink,
> 19:32:14)
>
> Meeting ended at 19:34:34 UTC.
>
>
>
>
> Action Items
> ------------
> * tflink or adamw - update beta release requirement to say "both"
> instead of "either"
> * adamw propose release criteria for media checksums and checksum
> filenames
> * tflink build boot.iso with new dracut for testing
>
>
>
>
> Action Items, by person
> -----------------------
> * adamw
> * tflink or adamw - update beta release requirement to say "both"
> instead of "either"
> * adamw propose release criteria for media checksums and checksum
> filenames
> * tflink
> * tflink or adamw - update beta release requirement to say "both"
> instead of "either"
> * tflink build boot.iso with new dracut for testing
> * **UNASSIGNED**
> * (none)
>
>
>
>
> People Present (lines said)
> ---------------------------
> * tflink (307)
> * adamw (250)
> * pjones (63)
> * bcl (55)
> * mizmo (35)
> * buggbot (31)
> * elad661 (16)
> * jwb (13)
> * brunowolff (11)
> * zodbot (8)
> * rbergeron (8)
> * robatino (6)
> * steve555 (5)
> * bodhi_zazen (4)
> * jlk (4)
> * nirik (2)
> * mclasen (2)
> * athmane (2)
>
>
>
>
> Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
>
> .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
>
>
> --
> test mailing list
> test at lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
>
--
Best regards,
Michal
http://eventhorizon.pl/
More information about the test
mailing list