Again: Oh no, something goes wrong
awilliam at redhat.com
Thu Sep 8 19:27:06 UTC 2011
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 14:12 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:42:07 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote:
> > Meanwhile, more updates have arrived, but could only be installed
> > in two steps due to remaining broken deps:
> I don't really want to bring this up again but the fact that updates
> with broken deps can end up on the mirros is a bug in bodhi and/or the
> compose tools. PERIOD.
I'd argue it's not really a 'bug' in the case of updates-testing. You
can't stop people submitting updates with dependency issues.
Would it be nice if AutoQA depcheck was 100% accurate and trusted enough
by maintainers that we could have it block packages that fail from
making it into updates-testing? Sure. But I'm not sure it's right to
characterize that as a 'bug'. Kinda semantics, I know.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
More information about the test