Draft: clarified 'boot method' test cases

[Adam Williamson]

Hey, folks. As discussed a couple of weeks back, I've always believed 
the boot.iso, DVD and live boot method test cases ought to test bare 
metal booting of actual physical optical media: we have no other test 
cases specifically for this, and we do have other test cases 
specifically for USB media and virtual machines (now). So it doesn't 
seem to make sense to consider a VM or USB test as a 'pass' for these 
test cases; potentially that could mean we ship a release without ever 
actually checking that it can be written to and booted from a real 
optical disc.

So, I've drafted up tweaked versions of three test cases which make 
this much clearer (and, in passing, remove obsolete references to 
anaconda's 'loader' stage, which no longer exists):

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_Testcase_Boot_Methods_Boot_Iso
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_Testcase_Boot_Methods_Dvd
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_Testcase_Boot_Methods_Live

The first two are slightly modified versions of:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Boot_Iso
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Dvd

The third is intended to replace:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Live_Image_Boot

Which is really very similar to the first two, but - presumably just 
because it happened to get written at a different time by a different 
person, or something - was worded quite differently and not named in the 
same way. It's newer than the other two, but really I kinda prefer the 
wording of the earlier ones. It seems to make sense to replace it with a 
test case based on the same wording and naming scheme as the other two.

Comments, improvements, suggestions, complaints? Lay 'em on! Thanks.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net