Liberation 2.0 Vs Liberation 1.0 (Need comments)

pravin.d.s at gmail.com pravin.d.s at gmail.com
Fri Dec 7 12:01:47 UTC 2012


On 6 December 2012 17:52, Kamil Paral <kparal at redhat.com> wrote:

> > > If you do keep the current blurry fonts as default (god forbid),
> > > please at least provide an easy way to switch to Fedora 17
> > > rendering
> > > style. Thanks.
> >
>
> > We all thought we need to wait for some more times for this feature.
> > Decided in Fedora i18 meeting to defer this feature now. I will
> > build liberation 1.07.2 soon for Fedora 18. It will solve the issue.
> > Backward compatibility is difficult in this case. But next time i
> > will give better try.
>
> Pravin, what exactly this means - will F18 repo contain both liberation 1
> and liberation 2 fonts? That means liberation 2 will automatically replace
> liberation 1 fonts on update, unless I use some yum extension to force the
> old version? Or is the solution different, like renaming liberation 2 fonts
> to liberation2 package?
>

No worries. Simply yum update will revert this change.  :)
Building liberation 1.07.2-11 with epoch for F18

Regards,
Pravin Satpute
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20121207/2efe83a9/attachment.html>


More information about the test mailing list