New test case for repository completeness

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 18:31 +0000, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Petr Schindler <pschindl <at> redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > 'A "fedora-release" package containing the correct names, information
> > and repository configuration for a final Fedora release (as opposed to a
> > pre-release) must be present on ISO media while the appropriately
> > versioned "generic-release" package must be available in the online
> > release repository'
> 
> It might be good to check also that fedora-release-rawhide is NOT on the media.
> There was a mixup with F15 where the original fedora-release depended on
> fedora-release-rawhide, causing it to be on the media. A fixed version of
> fedora-release which obsoleted it was pushed, which updated properly when using
> yum (which is what the testers including me were using), but not when using
> PackageKit ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716752 ) and this bug
> is still not fixed.

The 'correct repos' script should check for this by implication, because
if fedora-release-rawhide is installed, then the rawhide repository will
be present.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net