Proposal for enhancement of criterion

[Petr Schindler]

Because there was no suggestions, I've made changes. [1] is non-blockig
now. And I have amended criterion in [2].

[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Alpha_Release_Criteria

On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 09:48 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 07:15 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> 
> > > > Especially saving failures to disk is important for installation
> > > > without net access. There are test cases [1], [2] and [3] for
> > > > testing this feature.
> > > > 
> > > > [1]
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_bugzilla
> > > > [2]
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_disk
> > > > [3]
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system
> > > 
> > > Ah, that's part of my last-reply-but-one. :) I think certainly adding
> > > local disk at Alpha is reasonable. I'm not so sure about supporting
> > > saving to a remote system via ssh at Alpha.
> > 
> > Ok, I would propose to change test case [1] to non-blocking. I think it could be enough to support saving reports only to disk and bugzilla. So I propose criterion:
> > 
> > "The installer must be able to report failures to Bugzilla and local disk, with appropriate information included"
> > 
> > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system
> 
> That seems reasonable to me. Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
> -- 
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
> http://www.happyassassin.net
>