[Test-Announce] Proven tester status

[mike cloaked]

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno at wolff.to> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 18:20:38 -0800,
>  Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> As noted there, and as discussed at meetings and with FESCo, I'm hopeful
>> we'll be able to make use of proven tester status again once Bodhi 2.0
>> hits. Therefore I don't think we should take down all the documentation,
>> kill the group, or stop accepting membership requests. But do be aware
>> that, at present, proven tester status is basically meaningless.
>
> Note that statistics are still gathered and that future changes might depend
> on whether or not proventesters do a better job than average of correctly
> tagging builds as good or bad.

That particular issue would be useful to know - is there any current
data on whether at this point in time there is any evidence that
proventester karma is more helpful than the average in this regard?

-- 
mike c