F17 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #1 Minutes

[Tim Flink]

======================================
#fedora-bugzappers: F17-blocker-review
======================================

Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2012-01-27/f17-blocker-review.2012-01-27-17.01.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2012-01-27/f17-blocker-review.2012-01-27-17.01.txt
Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2012-01-27/f17-blocker-review.2012-01-27-17.01.log.html


Meeting summary
---------------
* roll call  (tflink, 17:01:21)

* Introduction  (tflink, 17:09:03)
  * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
    nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
    the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
    bugs.  (tflink, 17:09:19)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
    (tflink, 17:09:34)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers
    (tflink, 17:09:45)
  * 5 proposed blockers  (tflink, 17:09:56)
  * 1 proposed nth  (tflink, 17:10:07)

* (696482) Protective MBR entry on GPT drives must be marked active for
  some machines to boot, but this is a violation of GPT spec  (tflink,
  17:10:50)
  * LINK: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696482   (tflink,
    17:10:53)
  * Proposed Blocker, NEW  (tflink, 17:10:55)
  * AGREED: 754850 - AcceptedBlocker - In most cases (see
    Blocker_Bug_FAQ), a system installed according to any of the above
    criteria (or the appropriate Beta or Final criteria, when applying
    this criterion to those releases) must boot to the 'firstboot'
    utility on the first boot after installation, without unintended
    user intervention, unless the user explicitly chooses to boot in
    non-graphical mode. This includes correctly accessing any encrypted
    part  (tflink, 17:19:20)

* (742207) No usable bootloader option during a text mode f15->f16
  upgrade  (tflink, 17:19:55)
  * LINK: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742207   (tflink,
    17:19:58)
  * Proposed Blocker, NEW  (tflink, 17:20:01)
  * LINK:
    https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2012-January/msg00207.html
    (tflink, 17:24:33)
  * AGREED: - 742207 - RejectedBlocker, RejectedNTH (alpha),
    AcceptedBlocker (beta) - The installer must be able to successfully
    complete an upgrade installation from a clean, fully updated default
    installation (from any official install medium) of the previous
    stable Fedora release, either via preupgrade or by booting to the
    installer manually. The upgraded system must meet all release
    criteria  (tflink, 17:34:30)

* (784677) image installs erroneously change system hostname setting
  (tflink, 17:34:42)
  * LINK: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784677   (tflink,
    17:34:45)
  * Proposed Blocker, NEW  (tflink, 17:34:48)
  * AGREED: - 784677 - RejectedBlocker RejectedNTH - Doesn't hit any of
    the alpha release criteria  (tflink, 17:45:22)

* (750376) nss 3.13 breaks sssd TLS  (tflink, 17:45:35)
  * LINK: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750376   (tflink,
    17:45:35)
  * Proposed Blocker, MODIFIED  (tflink, 17:45:35)
  * AGREED: - 750376 - We need more information on the impact of this
    bug and whether or not it has been fixed in rawhide before making a
    decision  (tflink, 17:53:36)

* (725219) anaconda should run in clone not span mode  (tflink,
  17:53:47)
  * LINK: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725219   (tflink,
    17:53:48)
  * Proposed Blocker, NEW  (tflink, 17:53:48)
  * LINK:
    http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-17/f-17-quality-tasks.html
    <-- me casually drops that in here for when people get a chance
    (rbergeron, 18:00:54)
  * AGREED: 725219 - AcceptedNTH - There aren't any specific criteria
    for this bug but it is rather visable and interferes with
    installations  (tflink, 18:02:50)

* (741549) Login failure due to bad ~/.local/share/icc selinux file
  contexts  (tflink, 18:03:22)
  * LINK: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741549   (tflink,
    18:03:25)
  * Proposed NTH, NEW  (tflink, 18:03:28)
  * AGREED: 741549 - adam un-proposed this, so no action required
    (tflink, 18:11:15)

* open floor  (tflink, 18:11:36)
  * Next blocker bug review meeting - 2012-02-03 @ 17:00 UTC  (tflink,
    18:14:27)

Meeting ended at 18:17:16 UTC.




Action Items
------------





Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* tflink (138)
* adamw (107)
* jskladan (44)
* maxamillion (44)
* pschindl (12)
* buggbot (7)
* zodbot (4)
* rbergeron (2)
* nirik (1)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20120127/22779d0d/attachment.sig>