F17's usrmove and rpmfusion?

[Josh Boyer]

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
> Josh Boyer (jwboyer at gmail.com) said:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > Rob Healey (robhealey1 at gmail.com) said:
>> >> Can anyone tell me if rpmfusion's rawhide packages have been updated yet
>> >> for rpm guard?
>> >
>> > Given that, at best, rpmfusion builds against rawhide/branched Fedora,
>> > and that the converted packages only live in the side repository at the
>> > moment... no.
>> >
>> > It's not even clear that any rpmfusion packages would need modified.
>>
>> Harald has a patch to kernel.spec to install modules in /usr/lib/modules/
>> instead of /lib/.  When that goes in, I would think the rpmfusion kmods would
>> need a similar adjustment.
>
> As long as /lib redirects to /usr/lib... it shouldn't be *required*.

Then the patch to kernel.spec shouldn't be either.  My tiny brain says that if
one switches, the rest should too.

josh