Draft: separated-out Bodhi feedback guidelines

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 07/30/2012 01:43 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> Hi, folks. So, over the months, we've agglomerated some fairly useful
>> instructions on Bodhi karma in the proven testers page:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Proven_tester#Feedback_procedures
>>
>> However, as kparal's https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/287
>> ticket points out, this isn't really the best way to present this
>> information. It started out being written in a way that really
>> targeted
>> proven testers, but it's grown more and more generic over time and is
>> useful to much more than just proven testers; and the PT program is
>> suspended anyhow.
>>
>> So, in accordance with the suggestion in that ticket, I've drafted up
>> a
>> proposed separate page for the feedback guidelines. It's really just
>> the
>> Feedback Procedures section taken out and edited slightly to stand
>> alone
>> and no longer have anything specific to proven testers in it. I also
>> added a few things that I was planning to add to the section anyhow.
>>
>> Here's the draft:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_Update_feedback_guidelines
>>
>> If accepted, it would live at:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Update_feedback_guidelines
>>
>> and there would be links from various appropriate pages - from the
>> updates_testing page, the proven_testers page, and the Bodhi page at
>> least. The proven testers page would be appropriately tweaked to flow
>> correctly with the section left out. Finally, we would contact the
>> Bodhi
>> team and ask them to provide prominent links to the page in Bodhi.
>> Bodhi
>> actually already links to the proven testers page, but the link is an
>> unlabelled icon that's easy to miss (I never noticed it until today).
>>
>> Any comments or suggested improvements on either the text of the
>> draft
>> or the broad plan are welcome, either here or on the trac ticket.
>> Thanks!
> I like the text, let's do this.

Ack from me as well

JBG