Release criteria proposal: USB-written images

[Kamil Paral]

> * The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary
> architectures, with all system firmware types that are common on
> those
> architectures, from default live image, DVD, and boot.iso install
> media
> when written to an optical disc
> 
> Add new criterion:
> 
> * The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary
> architectures, with all system firmware types that are common on
> those
> architectures, from default live image, DVD, and boot.iso install
> media
> when written to a USB stick with at least one of the
> [[How_to_create_and_use_Live_USB|officially supported methods]]

Why don't we merge these two?

..... when written to an optical disc, or to a USB stick with at least one of the officially supported methods

One criterion instead of two. Less text.

> Beta:
> 
> Add new criterion:
> 
> * The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary
> architectures, with all system firmware types that are common on
> those
> architectures, from default live image, DVD, and boot.iso install
> media
> when written to a USB stick with any of the
> [[How_to_create_and_use_Live_USB|officially supported methods]]
> 
> The idea here is that at Alpha stage it must be possible to create a
> working USB stick _somehow_, and at Beta stage, all methods should be
> working. We could push the second criterion out to Final, I guess,
> but
> to me, this is becoming pretty core functionality. Seems like writing
> images to a stick is as common or more common than using actual media
> nowadays.

Agreed, USB sticks are getting used more and more. Beta stage sounds reasonable.