[Fedora QA] #296: Fix blocker bug tracker page and replace it with a static HTML page

[Fedora QA]

#296: Fix blocker bug tracker page and replace it with a static HTML page
-----------------------+-----------------------
  Reporter:  adamwill  |      Owner:  tflink
      Type:  task      |     Status:  new
  Priority:  major     |  Milestone:  Fedora 18
 Component:  Wiki      |    Version:
Resolution:            |   Keywords:
Blocked By:            |   Blocking:
-----------------------+-----------------------

Comment (by johannbg):

 Replying to [comment:2 adamwill]:
 > The meeting - it's in the log:
 >
 > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-06-11/fedora-
 qa.2012-06-11-15.03.log.html
 >
 > I don't think anyone said anything about there being a specific reason
 for it to be a wiki page during the meeting. What was the reason?

 Yeah I've been to busy to attend or followed up on all the meetings and
 will be for a another release cycle or two depending on the progress of
 the systemd migration process and the followed up clean up process that
 takes place when it's done.

 The reason for it was consolidation as in we want(ed) the information for
 reporters to use be in the same place.

 Mediawiki was the only option at that time with it's limitations as have
 been pointed out both in the present and we were aware of in the past.

 There is nothing wrong with using some other solution but that means a lot
 of work moving things from the wiki into that new thing or coming up with
 a front end that keeps tap of all this stuff and presents it to reporters
 for easy accessing.

 If I can recall correctly the only solution suggested at that time that
 held any potential water for success for the community, was the Fedora
 community app which at that time was in (very) early stages and which
 current status I'm unaware of. ( Reporters would just log in and all
 relevant information would be presented to them or within a grasp )

 We did look at various testing platforms ( not only for this ) but they as
 well fell short one way or another...

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/296#comment:4>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance