Gnutls 3??

[Richard Shaw]

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Michael Cronenworth <mike at cchtml.com> wrote:
> Nettle contains many pieces so I've taken an alternative approach to
> packaging it.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573

Yes, I noticed the separate libraries but was doing a minimal packaging job.

I wonder, is the package name "libnettle" acceptable? Generally the
main package name needs to be the same as the upstream name, which is
just nettle.

Also, the Requires: on the sub-packages should probably be arch specific, i.e.:

Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
should be
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}

Richard