QA as a sub-project: draft 'governance' section for the wiki

"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" johannbg at gmail.com
Thu Mar 22 10:23:02 UTC 2012


On 03/22/2012 08:54 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> That sounds all very reasonable to me but ultimately that's got 
> nothing to do what so ever to do with this issue or the board. It's up 
> to the relevant projects, and even leaders within those projects, to 
> reach out to each other and sort the differences and to make the merge 
> happen if it makes sense.
>

Arguable it does.

 From my point of view we should not make *any* changes to QA until we 
have sorted this out since as I see it things will be no better then 
they are now, until we do.

Once we have sorted this out we can properly plan and map the goals we 
want to work towards and then either present and or propose that to the 
board to be "sanctioned" or just do it ourselves since we are an rather 
self sustaining community or at least we have been up to this point.

JBG


More information about the test mailing list