Fedora ARM QA testing

Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com
Sat Mar 24 19:24:34 UTC 2012


On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 12:21 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:

> I pretty much agree, every time we've talked about it we've figured
> there's not actually a whole lot that needs to be done. The biggest
> thing really is to make sure there are people with every supported ARM
> target device who are willing to file a 'does it work' report (and,
> obviously, bugs where it doesn't) for each compose, I can't see a lot
> beyond that at present. Peter, can you? Are there any big problems with
> actually running ARM at the moment of the kind that would be appropriate
> to turn into test cases for the future, or is it really just a case
> right now of development grind in getting things to build?

Oh - and the other obvious thing to hit that _could_ in theory differ
from the other arches is the 'are there any conflicts in the packages on
the media' test (the packages could be different) and the 'can you
install updates' test (could be yum config or repo issues).
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net



More information about the test mailing list