Fedora online doc utility

[Tom H]

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Felix Miata <mrmazda at earthlink.net> wrote:
> On 2012/05/09 13:25 (GMT-0400) Tom H composed:
>> Felix Miata  wrote:
>
>>>  4-I filed a bug (still unfixed) 19 months ago about this:
>>>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638726 Like most of the web,
>>>  *fedoraproject.org is styled to be hard to use, with pale, tiny type
>>>  pervading.
>
>> fedoraproject.org's css isn't rude naive or stupid! The site's
>> beautiful and very well designed (except for the lack of a search
>> box!). It's also very clear and easily legible.
>
> Obviously you didn't digest the provided references explaining my
> statements. Clear and easily legible they may be under certain conditions,
> such as:

<big snip>


> Fedoraproject's styling may be well designed in the eyes of its naive
> designers or other ill-informed, but not among those who actually
> understand what makes any web design good, or those who understand and
> practice the concept of respect in web design, those who make pages that
> don't induce visitors to either hit the back button or close tab button,
> suffer, or employ defensive measures in order to use the pages without
> suffering.

Obviously, condescension and rudeness are strong points of yours.

You should respect the work of others before demanding respect of
anyone or of their html coding choices - and you should respect the
opinions of others.

My comment was, irrespective of the artistic and technical merits and
demerits of fedoraproject.org, that it is a very well designed site
from my perspective *_as_*_a_*_web_*_surfer_* (except, again as I
mentioned earlier, for the fact that it doesn't have a search option).
The underlying html may or may not be in need to be optimized or
cleaned up but the end result is very good.