Importance of LVM (was Re: Partitioning criteria revision proposal)

[drago01]

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Robyn Bergeron <rbergero at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I am under the impression that we've been testing with/without LVM anyway,
> both scenarios? In any case, it doesn't seem as earthshaking as other
> developments - it's just making the default be what it's been for some time,
> and given that there exists documentation for the "lvm enabled case" and not
> much otherwise it seems like a reasonable thing to do.  I would almost make
> the case that disabling LVM by default - were it a feature - would require a
> lot of that backup documentation and info that isn't really there....

Which documentation? FS directly on a partition has way more
documentation then anything else ... it is what the rest of the world
is using.