[fedora-arm] Proposed Base and Desktop matrix adjustments for ARM as primary

[Adam Williamson]

On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 11:17 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 08/20/2013 10:35 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 23:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>> Following on my little series, we also need to adjust the Base and
> >>> Desktop matrices for ARM as primary arch, but the good news is the
> >>> changes are pretty simple.
> >> As discussed at the QA meeting this morning, I've gone ahead and pushed
> >> all the proposed changes so far into 'production'. I'll try and draft up
> >> the remaining change for visible cloud ASAP. thanks folks!
> > I might have missed something, but is XFCE really non-blocking for ARM? I remember someone saying that XFCE is the most important desktop for them. (and also that GNOME doesn't work almost anywhere).
> 
>  From my pov we ( as in the QA community ) really should not be release 
> blocking on desktop environments.
> 
> However the desktop environments sub-communities might decide for 
> themselves which arch they support and if they are release blocking for 
> them and test accordingly.
> 
> I assume we will adopt our release blocking criteria in accordance with 
> whatever comes out of this ring proposal ( Although I still not seeing 
> how that proposal actually solves anything for us ), specifically 
> workstation and which DE it will ship  ( which probably will be either 
> Gnome or KDE ) and drop the requirement for the other one in the process.

My take was just to wait and see what really happens for now.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net