Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications

[Bill Nottingham]

"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johannbg at gmail.com) said: 
> The DVD is releng/fesco responsibility, they dictate and decide
> what's on it and what not and how it's delivered not the
> sub-community's.

Really? 

The KDE SIG has full access to change what gets installed when you 
install from the DVD. If you're saying it's releng and FESCo's
responsibility to fix that, then as a releng and FESCo member, I'll fix it...

commit f349ff05510a1f60cb43470cb544d55136c837c3 (HEAD, f20)
Author: Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Dec 13 12:22:39 2013 -0500

    Drop KDE from the DVD, to avoid blocker bugs due to installed package set.

diff --git a/fedora-install-fedora.ks b/fedora-install-fedora.ks
index f1a767f..fd9f4e9 100644
--- a/fedora-install-fedora.ks
+++ b/fedora-install-fedora.ks
@@ -73,13 +73,6 @@ dracut-*
 @libreoffice
 @gnome-games
 
-## KDE
- at kde-desktop
- at kde-apps
- at kde-education
- at kde-media
- at kde-office
-
 ## XFCE
 @xfce-desktop
 @xfce-apps
@@ -111,7 +104,6 @@ dracut-*
 @rpm-development-tools
 @fedora-packager
 @gnome-software-development
- at kde-software-development
 @x-software-development
 @virtualization
 @web-server
@@ -139,8 +131,6 @@ autocorr-*
 eclipse-nls-*
 hunspell-*
 hyphen-*
-calligra-l10n-*
-kde-l10n-*
 libreoffice-langpack-*
 man-pages-*
 mythes-*

commit 833fdfaf7ec6a9588b1d51a11b9a2a9d956ab873 (HEAD, master)
Author: Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Dec 13 12:25:13 2013 -0500

    Drop KDE environment as an installation choice. Live media is the SIG-supported install method.

diff --git a/comps-f21.xml.in b/comps-f21.xml.in
index 66ff5c5..f462e58 100644
--- a/comps-f21.xml.in
+++ b/comps-f21.xml.in
@@ -6200,34 +6200,6 @@
     </optionlist>
   </environment>
   <environment>
-    <id>kde-desktop-environment</id>
-    <_name>KDE Plasma Workspaces</_name>
-    <_description>The KDE Plasma Workspaces, a highly-configurable graphical user interface which includes a panel, desktop, system icons and desktop widgets, and many powerful KDE applications.</_description>
-    <display_order>10</display_order>
-    <grouplist>
-      <groupid>base-x</groupid>
-      <groupid>standard</groupid>
-      <groupid>core</groupid>
-      <groupid>admin-tools</groupid>
-      <groupid>dial-up</groupid>
-      <groupid>fonts</groupid>
-      <groupid>input-methods</groupid>
-      <groupid>multimedia</groupid>
-      <groupid>hardware-support</groupid>
-      <groupid>printing</groupid>
-      <groupid>guest-desktop-agents</groupid>
-      <groupid>kde-desktop</groupid>
-    </grouplist>
-    <optionlist>
-      <groupid>kde-apps</groupid>
-      <groupid>kde-education</groupid>
-      <groupid>kde-media</groupid>
-      <groupid>kde-office</groupid>
-      <groupid>kde-telepathy</groupid>
-      <groupid>3d-printing</groupid>
-    </optionlist>
-  </environment>
-  <environment>
     <id>xfce-desktop-environment</id>
     <_name>Xfce Desktop</_name>
     <_description>A lightweight desktop environment that works well on low end machines.</_description>

Ready to push whenever.

Now, I'm ASSuming they don't actually want that. But, to be clear: the
installation choices of the assorted desktops on the DVD/netinstall are the
provence of those SIGs. If they don't want to maintain them, we can absolutely
remove them, just as we'd do for any Spin that was not maintained or tested.

Bill