Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications

[Adam Williamson]

On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 16:42 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 12:44 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
> > As I've said, if people are willing to actually go out and do that, then
> > fine. Does desktop team actively curate the DVD-installed package set?
> > And to play the counter-factual game: imagine there had been a bug
> > analogous to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040922 in
> > GNOME on the day of Go/No-Go meeting. Is the desktop SIG willing to take
> > a stand and say 'yes, we should delay the release multiple weeks over
> > Christmas if such a bug is discovered'?
> > 
> > If so, then we can continue with the current criteria, though it would
> > be ideal if desktop and KDE sigs could commit to helping with the
> > testing.
> 
> No, I take pretty much the same stance wrt. to the DVD: I pay attention
> to the live image, and make sure it works. I don't think I've ever
> downloaded or tried the DVD. I always found it very odd and awkward that
> we hand out something at conferences and shows that nobody really pays
> attention to.

Well, then there's the problem. We can't have release criteria that say
"we really stand behind the package sets installed from the DVD" if we
don't.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net