Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already

[Mike Ruckman]

On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:35:56 +0000
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On mán 16.des 2013 21:00, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Even though we don't really have a lot of use for the FAS group,
> 
> None what so ever.
> 
> >   Fedora
> > as a whole is set up such that 'being a member of a FAS group' is a
> > bar to entry for some things,
> 
> Not with us and never should be.
> 
> > so it seems like we're putting ourselves at a
> > disadvantage by not putting our members in our FAS group.
> 
> No we are not and we are putting ourselves in advantage by not doing
> so.
> 
> JBG

For those of us who haven't been with QA for even a year yet, can you
give a brief "too long; didn't read" synopsis of your reasoning and
where it stems from? Without some form of background it's hard to infer
what your reasoning is.

Thanks!

// Roshi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20131216/c4dc3aa1/attachment.sig>