Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already

[Chris Murphy]

On Dec 16, 2013, at 3:06 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On mán 16.des 2013 21:45, Mike Ruckman wrote:
>> For those of us who haven't been with QA for even a year yet, can you
>> give a brief "too long; didn't read" synopsis of your reasoning and
>> where it stems from? Without some form of background it's hard to infer
>> what your reasoning is.
> 
> You can look at the archive why we initially dropped the QA group and the reasoning why we should not revive the QA group is related to the future and I ain't talking about the future WG's "providing" us with but an actual future and direction for the project be heading into.
> 
> Adam is right about what's wrong but as so often he's trying to fix it in the wrong place…

Seems to me it'll either be sorta useful, or it'll be completely utterly useless yet still benign. *shrug*


Chris Murphy