Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already

[Mike Ruckman]

On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:33:05 +0000
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On mán 16.des 2013 22:12, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > What, in your estimation, would be the right place? Instead of just
> > saying 'no', can you provide an alternative solution to the problem?
> 
> Solution to fix this lies not within in us ( QA ) the alternative 
> solution requires a real change in the project not dressing the
> emperor in new clothes which the WG proposal does.
> 
> JBG

How does the WG tie into getting people like danofsatx access to
Fedorapeople and the other access they could use?

// Roshi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20131216/f281b007/attachment.sig>