any report of fedup f19->f20?

Temlakos temlakos at gmail.com
Wed Dec 18 23:58:34 UTC 2013


On 12/18/2013 06:50 PM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote:
>
>   * I don't actually know one way or another but it feels like it
>     might just be similar in my case since I've confirmed I'm using
>     0.8 and it's no different. Has anyone else *not* fixed this with
>     the suggested update?
>
>
> Thanks, Phil
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Bruno Medeiros <brunojcm at gmail.com 
> <mailto:brunojcm at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     BrunoJCM
>     (Enviado do Tablet)
>     Em 17/12/2013 13:13, "Neal Becker" <ndbecker2 at gmail.com
>     <mailto:ndbecker2 at gmail.com>> escreveu:
>     >
>     > success/failure?
>
>     I had this one, I reported on this list a few weeks ago:
>     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038863
>
>     fedup 0.8 also fixed the problem for me.
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     --
>     Bruno Medeiros
>
>
>     --
>     test mailing list
>     test at lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:test at lists.fedoraproject.org>
>     To unsubscribe:
>     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
>
>
>
>

The newest version of fedup available to me (not using updates-testing) 
is 0.7.

Is someone going to push fedup version 0,8 to updates (stable) soon? Do 
I wait for that? Or enable updates-testing and run an update before I 
proceed?

Temlakos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20131218/c3fbaac6/attachment.html>


More information about the test mailing list