any report of fedup f19->f20?
Temlakos
temlakos at gmail.com
Wed Dec 18 23:58:34 UTC 2013
On 12/18/2013 06:50 PM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote:
>
> * I don't actually know one way or another but it feels like it
> might just be similar in my case since I've confirmed I'm using
> 0.8 and it's no different. Has anyone else *not* fixed this with
> the suggested update?
>
>
> Thanks, Phil
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Bruno Medeiros <brunojcm at gmail.com
> <mailto:brunojcm at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> BrunoJCM
> (Enviado do Tablet)
> Em 17/12/2013 13:13, "Neal Becker" <ndbecker2 at gmail.com
> <mailto:ndbecker2 at gmail.com>> escreveu:
> >
> > success/failure?
>
> I had this one, I reported on this list a few weeks ago:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038863
>
> fedup 0.8 also fixed the problem for me.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Bruno Medeiros
>
>
> --
> test mailing list
> test at lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:test at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> To unsubscribe:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
>
>
>
>
The newest version of fedup available to me (not using updates-testing)
is 0.7.
Is someone going to push fedup version 0,8 to updates (stable) soon? Do
I wait for that? Or enable updates-testing and run an update before I
proceed?
Temlakos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20131218/c3fbaac6/attachment.html>
More information about the test
mailing list