any report of fedup f19->f20?

[Temlakos]

On 12/18/2013 09:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 18:58 -0500, Temlakos wrote:
>> On 12/18/2013 06:50 PM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote:
>>
>>>        * I don't actually know one way or another but it feels like
>>>          it might just be similar in my case since I've confirmed I'm
>>>          using 0.8 and it's no different. Has anyone else *not* fixed
>>>          this with the suggested update?
>>>
>>> Thanks, Phil
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Bruno Medeiros <brunojcm at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>          BrunoJCM
>>>          (Enviado do Tablet)
>>>          Em 17/12/2013 13:13, "Neal Becker" <ndbecker2 at gmail.com>
>>>          escreveu:
>>>          >
>>>          > success/failure?
>>>          
>>>          I had this one, I reported on this list a few weeks ago:
>>>          https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038863
>>>          
>>>          fedup 0.8 also fixed the problem for me.
>>>          
>>>          Thanks,
>>>          
>>>          --
>>>          Bruno Medeiros
>>>          
>>>          
>>>          --
>>>          test mailing list
>>>          test at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>          To unsubscribe:
>>>          https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> The newest version of fedup available to me (not using
>> updates-testing) is 0.7. ne
>>
>> Is someone going to push fedup version 0,8 to updates (stable) soon?
>> Do I wait for that? Or enable updates-testing and run an update before
>> I proceed?
> It's on its way to stable updates ATM so if you wait you won't have to
> wait long, but it's perfectly safe to grab it from u-t if you want to
> upgrade right now.

I'm not in that kind of hurry. I saw a statement about known issues with 
updating. The official line seems to be: fedup version 0.7 will not 
work, so don't try it. Either wait, or enable u-t just long enough to 
grab version 0.8. (And if one /does/ try it, the new fedup needs 
workarounds to clean up the garbage.)

Since fedora-release also is at issue (for GPG signature checking), I'll 
watch the system updates closely for the new fedup.

My last experience with fedup was instructive. Plymouth ran well with 
it, but showed me a /very/ small progress bar that appeared frozen for a 
long time. It wasn't frozen. The update ran well last time. But I 
probably would run it when I had to be away from it anyway. You see, in 
America we have a saying: "A watched teapot never boils."

Temlakos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20131219/7e5e0aff/attachment-0001.html>