any report of fedup f19->f20?
Temlakos
temlakos at gmail.com
Fri Dec 20 10:13:13 UTC 2013
On 12/20/2013 05:04 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> On 19/12/13 23:49, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Gavin Flower
>> <GavinFlower at archidevsys.co.nz <mailto:GavinFlower at archidevsys.co.nz>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> long time. It wasn't frozen. The update ran well last time. But I
>>> probably would run it when I had to be away from it anyway. You
>>> see,
>>> in America we have a saying: "A watched teapot never boils."
>>> It's an old English saying in fact :)
>> Even an unwatched _*teapot*_ should not boil!
>>
>> You mean a _*kettle*_?
>>
>> I am English born.
>>
>>
>>
>> "A watched pot never boils" is the way I've always heard it.
>
> Well, I've been English all me life & live In London so I can say with
> some certainty that you're correct: 'a watched pot never boils' :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil...
>
Well, pots and kettles aside:
I just ran the update. The only thing I'm curious about:
1. Fedup did not start any kind of GUI. It stayed in command-line prompt
mode. Actually that was an improvement: I could better watch its
progress. But I wasn't sure whether that was what the maintainers wanted
to achieve.
2. After I ran the suggested yum distro-sync cleanup command, my system
rolled fedup back to version 0.7, along with some fifteen other packages
that apparently were no up to the latest-and-greatest in the F20 stable
repos. AFAIK, Im not missing anything, but I'm not sure I would know
about that.
Temlakos
More information about the test
mailing list