Keyboard layout criterion

Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com
Tue Jan 15 22:34:47 UTC 2013


On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 21:05 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 18:34 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> >
> >> > Even if we assume that gets done for F19, we have something like 400+
> >> > layouts in the installer now. We can fudge the criterion at
> >> > interpretation time and say 'well it's okay if just one or two really
> >> > obscure ones are broken' but it might be nice if we could build that
> >> > into the criterion itself - one of the complaints people have about the
> >> > process currently is that there are cases where you have to 'know what
> >> > the criterion really means', and it'd be nice to avoid as many of those
> >> > as possible going forward.
> >>
> >> How about defining a list of ones that must work? i.e to define what
> >> "obscure" means.
> >
> > A hard list feels unwieldy (sorry to be awkward). A simple kludge is the
> > layouts associated with the languages listed on the welcome screen. Or
> > the alternative approach is just to try and word a bit of wiggle room
> > into the way the criterion is written...if you can't think of a way to
> > do that I can take a cut at it later, maybe...
> 
> OK feel free to try it just shouldn't be too vague in the sense "we
> care about keyboard layouts" without any specifics.

Proposal: replace all criteria with "We care! We care a lot!"
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net



More information about the test mailing list