'Nice to have' process is now 'Freeze exception' process, improvements to blocker / freeze exception tracker aliases

Kamil Paral kparal at redhat.com
Wed Jan 23 10:01:14 UTC 2013

> There was a very solid consensus that the old scheme sucked and the
> final form of the new proposal was miles better, and this is not the
> first time the topic has come up (there are various proposals in the
> list archives). So I decided to go ahead and Just Do It, putting the
> proposal into 'production' today. I have adjusted the tracker bugs
> themselves,
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Trackers ,
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process ,
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting , and
> renamed
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_nth_bug_process to
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process
> and
> adjusted it. I have also made the obvious changes to the relatively
> large number of other wiki pages that link to and talk about the
> 'nth' /
> 'freeze exception' process: see my Wiki edit history for those
> changes.

This would deserve to go to test-announce, I think. Any objections?

More information about the test mailing list