Negative karma for missing update descriptions?

[Remi Collet]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Le 04/07/2013 17:09, Ankur Sinha a écrit :
> On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 14:51 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> How does a reporter supposed to know which bugs are fixed if
>> there is no update description?
> 
> One can specify what bugs an update fixes in Bodhi. These bugs are 
> closed when the update goes stable, and these bugs are listed both
> in bodhi and in fedora-easy-karma.
> 
> All the updates I've seen today that received negative karma for
> their descriptions had these bugs specified.

I think an update with some bug link(s) really "have" a description.

And I also think that an update without description (really no
description, or only a short silly message) could receive negative karma.

But probably because I always try to give as much as possible
information in my updates.

Remi.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlHVlOUACgkQYUppBSnxahgYWgCdGgrzupwG/pVI2rPHNLKrzLmw
iRAAnRzEbQfKGfjOauV3f37vL/IOhqm6
=jxqw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----