Negative karma for missing update descriptions?

Akshay Vyas akshayvyas29 at gmail.com
Thu Jul 4 16:21:14 UTC 2013


>Well, I hate writing descriptions for new package.

>But this "catanzaro" still gave me -1 to the update.

>You can email me with the issue and I can edit, but -1 is not good.

Completely agree

>Sure it should, the update is defective. The description isn't optional

it should, only when the bug fixed are not described, i think providing the
bug # is sufficient and in this case (
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12227/youtube-dl-2013.07.02-1.fc19?_csrf_token=250e02ff8797fd26dd3eae7265854ece8c1b1e27)
providing -ve karma is so inappropriate

>
-- 

Akshay vyas
(http://www.gofedora.in)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20130704/0d3ef260/attachment.html>


More information about the test mailing list