Adjusting basic video driver testcase for UEFI systems

Adam Jackson ajax at redhat.com
Thu Jul 11 21:06:51 UTC 2013


On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:47 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 16:28 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > 
> > > As things stand, we don't really have a fallback graphics method for
> > > UEFI.
> > 
> > False.
> 
> In what way? That was the impression I was getting from the discussions
> in the bugs. If we have one, what is it? How should it be triggered?

In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977816#c7 you say:

> fortuitously, though, since the modern X drivers for the major cards -
> nouveau, radeon, intel - all require KMS, simply passing 'nomodeset'
> has the effect we want: you wind up getting vesa as the fallback
> driver, because the main driver refuses to load without KMS.

That _is_ the fallback.  And, as I said in the other fork of this
thread, you ought to get the fbdev driver in this scenario.

If that doesn't _work_, then that's merely a bug.  But it ought to.

- ajax



More information about the test mailing list