Youtube, not all songs-videos can be played, F19_64

Michael Schwendt mschwendt at gmail.com
Sat Jul 13 10:24:54 UTC 2013


On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 23:13:08 -0400 (EDT), Joerg Lechner wrote:

> I installed the Flash Player via the Adobe Home Page " http://get.adobe.com/de/flashplayer/". First I tried the link "Yum for Linux" (I know Yum, Yum Extender from Fedora), there is the version number "http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/adobe-release/adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch.rpm" serviced, which does not work for Firefox/F19 correctly, not all Youtube files can be played, my error that I didn't give a detailed test description. 
>

"Slow down a bit, please." That's something I find myself telling people more often recently.
There's a lot of unnecessary confusion in this thread.

You can also read the other reply I've typed in a few minutes ago, but the package you've
installed, adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch.rpm, is just a repository definition package,
which gives you access to a repository that contains the one and only flash-plugin package.
You're not done with installing the adobe-release-x86_64 package. You need an additional
"yum install flash-plugin" to download and install the actual Flash package.

> The next try was "RPM fuer andere Linux Distributionen". There one gets the version "http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/pdc/11.2.202.297/flash-plugin-11.2.202.297-release.x86_64.rpm". This Version runs in my F19_64 configuration (Firefox/F19_64)
>

That's the same one. Even if the checksum may be different, the contents are exactly the same:

$ rpmdev-diff flash-plugin-11.2.202.297-release.x86_64.rpm /var/cache/yum/x86_64/19/adobe-linux-x86_64/packages/flash-plugin-11.2.202.297-release.x86_64.rpm 
$

> The differencies I have noticed is that Youtrube files i.e, where there is a "sign"or "trade mark" like "vesa" on it, I could not play with x86_64-1.0-1, but I can these Videos play with 11.2.202.297-release.x86_64. I didn't install via command line, I installed simply clicking on the downloaded file and had rpm doing this work.
> Kind Regards

You're comparing wrong packages there. As explained above. You haven't had Flash installed
when you tried the videos for the first time. You've had just the adobe-release package.

-- 
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) - Linux 3.9.9-301.fc19.x86_64
loadavg: 0.17 0.08 0.11


More information about the test mailing list