Most latest mirrors for fedora

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:52:52 -0700
Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:

> Note that the situation with sssd is a bit complex. The broken update
> was submitted for updates-testing on 06-12 at 12:01, and pushed to
> updates-testing on 06-12 at 12:41. It was then marked to be
> 'unpushed' - i.e. taken off the mirrors - on 06-13 at 01:28. A fixed
> sssd package was then added to the update and submitted for
> updates-testing on 06-13 at 10:56, and pushed to updates-testing on
> 06-13 at 15:53.
> 
> I'm not sure whether unpushes require any manual action or if they
> happen automatically, but if the unpush actually happened, then there
> was a time when the 'most current' state of the mirrors would have an
> *older* sssd package than a 'less current' state of the mirrors - a
> 'less current' mirror would still have the broken update, but a 'more
> current' mirror would have had it removed. It's not _always_ the case
> that the mirror with a higher-versioned package is the more up to
> date. 99% of the time, but not always.

Yeah, true. 

When a package that has been 'pushed' to updates-testing is unpushed,
it simply means the next compose that package will be removed. It
doesn't do it right when the 'unpush' event happens, if it did it would
require a full recompose/push of the updates-testing repo, which isn't
practical. 

So yeah, correct with updates-testing. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20130613/3627d392/attachment.sig>