Proposed changes to blocker bug meeting processes

[Adam Williamson]

On 21/02/13 01:11 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> We discussed a few possible changes to the blocker bug meeting
>> process
>> at the QA meeting this week. It was agreed that I'd draft up these
>> changes for list discussion. So here they are! Sent to test@ and
>> devel@
>> as QA, devel and releng are the stakeholders in this process: I'm
>> figuring releng folks are all subscribed to one list or the other.
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_SOP_blocker_bug_meeting
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_SOP_blocker_bug_process
>>
> As it did these moves during F18 cycle, it makes sense. Also I hope F19
> won't be such beast as F18 (yeah, hope :D). With automatic blocker status
> for specific bug types, I think we are going the good direction! Thanks
> guys!

Thanks for the feedback, Jaro and others. As per the discussion at the 
meeting on Monday, I've gone ahead and put these changes into 
production. So everyone remember to use #fedora-blocker-review for the 
next blocker meeting :)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net