new btrfs-progs needs testing and karma

[Gene Czarcinski]

On 11/21/2013 10:25 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2013, at 8:04 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 19:52 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> On Nov 21, 2013, at 5:08 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 14:53 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>>>> btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20131114git9f0c53f-1.fc20 incorporates 16KB
>>>>> leafsize/nodesize by default, which significantly reduces metadata
>>>>> fragmentation and improves performance. Since this is set at the time
>>>>> the file system is created, it would be nice to get this in before
>>>>> freeze. Since it's the new default, it's considered safe.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is one minor regression found, which is 'btrfs filesystem show'
>>>>> reports duplicate volumes. A fix is committed upstream already and a
>>>>> post-install update will fix this.
>>>> Why not just get it in now? Final doesn't freeze for another week.
>>> It needs 2 more karma points, doesn't it?
>> What? I'm talking about the fix that sounds like it hasn't been put into
>> Fedora at all yet.
> Oh, got it. That fix was committed upstream a few days ago. It's a question for Eric Sandeen or Josef if it's possible.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031299
>
>
> Chris Murphy
Raher than just "btrfs fi show", give "btrfs fi show -m" a try.

Until the patch is in it makes this a little easier.  Another problem 
however is that this update seriously breaks system-storage-manager 
(which the package maintainer admitted is badly backlevel).

Gene