F20 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #3 Minutes
Tim Flink
tflink at redhat.com
Wed Sep 4 17:46:27 UTC 2013
=================================================
#fedora-blocker-review: f20alpha-blocker-review-3
=================================================
Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-09-04/f20alpha-blocker-review-3.2013-09-04-16.01.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-09-04/f20alpha-blocker-review-3.2013-09-04-16.01.txt
Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-09-04/f20alpha-blocker-review-3.2013-09-04-16.01.log.html
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (tflink, 16:01:32)
* Introduction (tflink, 16:08:32)
* Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and freeze
exception bugs. (tflink, 16:08:44)
* We'll be following the process outlined at: (tflink, 16:08:51)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(tflink, 16:08:51)
* The bugs up for review today are available at: (tflink, 16:08:58)
* LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (tflink,
16:08:59)
* Up for review today, we have: (tflink, 16:09:05)
* 8 Proposed Blockers (tflink, 16:09:12)
* 5 Accepted Blockers (tflink, 16:09:12)
* 0 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:09:12)
* 3 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:09:12)
* (1000703) TypeError: not enough arguments for format string (tflink,
16:10:10)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000703 (tflink,
16:10:13)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 16:10:15)
* AGREED: 1000703 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - This
doesn't violate any F20 alpha release critera and thus does not
qualify as a release blocking bug. However, a tested fix would be
considered past freeze. (tflink, 16:18:22)
* (1002811) Anaconda is unable to handle dependcy problems without
crashing (tflink, 16:18:34)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002811 (tflink,
16:18:37)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:18:40)
* AGREED: 1002811 - RejectedBlocker RejectedFreezeException - This
doesn't violate any F20 alpha release criterion and is a request for
anaconda behavior change and thus doesn't qualify as a release
blocking bug for F20 alpha. (tflink, 16:30:46)
* (1003229) TC2 Net installer fails with Error 256 (tflink, 16:31:39)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003229 (tflink,
16:31:40)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:31:40)
* AGREED: 1003229 - RejectedBlocker - This appears to be a mirror
issue and does not violate any F20 alpha release criteria, thus
rejected as a release blocking bug for f20 alpha. (tflink,
16:38:34)
* (994180) Boot-time LUKS passphrase input *always* defaults to en-us
(tflink, 16:38:42)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994180 (tflink,
16:38:45)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:38:48)
* AGREED: 994180 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha
release criterion for systems with a non-us keyboard and encrypted
disks: "A working mechanism to create a user account must be clearly
presented during installation and/or first boot of the installed
system." (tflink, 16:50:20)
* (1004323) Apper: "You have failed to provide correct authentication."
while checking/installing updates (tflink, 16:50:34)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004323 (tflink,
16:50:38)
* Proposed Blocker, apper, NEW (tflink, 16:50:40)
* AGREED: 1004323 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha
release criterion for KDE: "The installed system must be able to
download and install updates with yum and with the default graphical
package manager in all release-blocking desktops." (tflink,
16:53:40)
* (1003691) firefox pretrans scriptlet issues (tflink, 16:53:45)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003691 (tflink,
16:53:46)
* Proposed Blocker, firefox, ON_QA (tflink, 16:53:46)
* AGREED: 1003691 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha
release criterion for firefox, which is part of the default gnome
install: "There must be no errors in any package on the
release-blocking images which cause the package to fail to install."
(tflink, 16:55:48)
* (1002737) initial-setup-graphical.service does not run - TypeError:
Argument 1 does not allow None as a value (tflink, 16:56:04)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002737 (tflink,
16:56:07)
* Proposed Blocker, initial-setup, NEW (tflink, 16:56:09)
* AGREED: 1002737 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha
release criterion for ARM images with a graphical desktop: "A system
installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in
screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a
user account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility."
(tflink, 16:58:52)
* (985569) libuser wrongly sets "date of last password change" shadow
field to 0 on systems without an rtc (tflink, 16:59:07)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985569 (tflink,
16:59:10)
* Proposed Blocker, libuser, ASSIGNED (tflink, 16:59:13)
* AGREED: 985569 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - This
doesn't violate any of the F20 alpha release criteria and thus is
rejected as a release blocking bug for alpha. However, a tested fix
would be considered past freeze. (tflink, 17:03:44)
* (1004421) f20 SoaS TC3 uses gdm which defaults to gnome. Autologon
starts gnome with no chance to choose sugar-desktop (tflink,
17:06:56)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004421 (tflink,
17:06:59)
* Proposed Freeze Exception, sugar, NEW (tflink, 17:07:02)
* AGREED: 1004421 - AcceptedFreezeException - This prevents SoaS from
booting properly and would be a blocker for a release blocking DE,
therefore accepted as a FE for F20 alpha. (tflink, 17:09:44)
* Accepted blockers (kparal, 17:11:52)
* 1000715, 1001081 are waiting on TC3 (tflink, 17:12:03)
* 1002055 is waiting on gnome update (tflink, 17:12:14)
* 1000889 has a patch, should be in next anaconda build (tflink,
17:12:26)
* AGREED: no more review of accepted blockers is needed today, all
seem to be progressing well (tflink, 17:15:16)
* Open Floor (tflink, 17:15:22)
* F20 Alpha TC3 should be landing shortly, will need testing (tflink,
17:18:15)
* next blocker review meeting will be 2013-09-11 @ 16:00 UTC unless
another meeting is needed on 2013-09-09 (tflink, 17:18:56)
Meeting ended at 17:21:46 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* tflink (174)
* kparal (69)
* Viking-Ice (59)
* jreznik (19)
* pwhalen (13)
* Martix (12)
* handsome_pirate (7)
* kalev (5)
* pschindl (5)
* zodbot (4)
* spstarr_work (3)
* satellit_e (3)
* dgilmore (2)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20130904/b5a1d5df/attachment.sig>
More information about the test
mailing list