F20 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #4 Minutes

Tim Flink tflink at redhat.com
Mon Sep 9 17:41:36 UTC 2013 

=================================================
#fedora-blocker-review: f20alpha-blocker-review-4
=================================================


Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-09-09/f20alpha-blocker-review-4.2013-09-09-16.00.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-09-09/f20alpha-blocker-review-4.2013-09-09-16.00.txt
Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-09-09/f20alpha-blocker-review-4.2013-09-09-16.00.log.html


Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call  (tflink, 16:00:37)

* Introduction  (tflink, 16:03:36)
  * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
    nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
    the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and freeze
    exception bugs.  (tflink, 16:03:41)
  * We'll be following the process outlined at:  (tflink, 16:03:46)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
    (tflink, 16:03:46)
  * The bugs up for review today are available at:  (tflink, 16:03:51)
  * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current   (tflink,
    16:03:51)
  * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at:  (tflink,
    16:03:57)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria
    (tflink, 16:03:57)
  * Up for review today, we have:  (tflink, 16:04:02)
  * 5 Proposed Blockers  (tflink, 16:04:11)
  * 7 Accepted Blockers  (tflink, 16:04:12)
  * 1 Proposed Freeze Exceptions  (tflink, 16:04:12)
  * 6 Accepted Freeze Exceptions  (tflink, 16:04:12)

* (1005249) netinst with text mode doesn't allow to install GNOME
  (tflink, 16:05:04)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005249   (tflink,
    16:05:07)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (tflink, 16:05:10)
  * AGREED: This may end up being a package/mirror issue and needs more
    data. will revisit at the next review meeting  (tflink, 16:15:14)

* (1005251) Prepare Fedora 20 wallpaper  (tflink, 16:15:22)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005251   (tflink,
    16:15:22)
  * Proposed Blocker, distribution, NEW  (tflink, 16:15:23)
  * AGREED: 1005251 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha
    release criterion: "The default desktop background must be different
    from that of the two previous stable releases."  (tflink, 16:18:12)

* (1005232) Update Fedora 20 release name to Heisenbug  (tflink,
  16:18:20)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005232   (tflink,
    16:18:20)
  * Proposed Blocker, fedora-release, ON_QA  (tflink, 16:18:20)
  * AGREED: 1005232 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha
    release criterion: "Any component which prominently identifies a
    Fedora release version number, code name or milestone (Alpha, Beta,
    Final) must do so correctly."  (tflink, 16:20:14)

* (1002464) cannot unlock gnome lock screen  (tflink, 16:20:21)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002464   (tflink,
    16:20:21)
  * Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, MODIFIED  (tflink, 16:20:21)
  * AGREED: 1002464 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - While
    this doesn't violate any of the F20 alpha release criterion, it is a
    rather ugly problem that's easy to hit. A tested fix would be
    considered past freeze  (tflink, 16:31:24)

* (1004902) Error in `/usr/bin/sddm': double free or corruption (!prev):
  0xb7b06c28  (tflink, 16:31:46)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004902   (tflink,
    16:31:49)
  * Proposed Blocker, sddm, MODIFIED  (tflink, 16:31:52)
  * AGREED: 1004902 - AcceptedBlocker - While not a 100% clear-cut
    violation of the criteria for KDE, this was deemed close enough to a
    violation to take as a release blocking bug for F20 alpha: "A system
    installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in
    screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a
    user account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility."
    (tflink, 16:47:56)

* (1005435) Trimslice requires kernel-3.11.0-300.fc20 for network in F20
  Alpha  (tflink, 16:49:11)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005435   (tflink,
    16:49:14)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, kernel, ON_QA  (tflink, 16:49:16)
  * AGREED: 1005435 - AcceptedFreezeException - This fixes wired
    networking on the trimslice which is a supported platform for F20
    alpha. A tested fix would be considered after freeze  (tflink,
    16:50:46)

* (997690) SizeNotPositiveError: bytes= param must be >=0  (tflink,
  16:51:26)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997690   (tflink,
    16:51:26)
  * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED  (tflink, 16:51:26)
  * this was supposed to be fixed but new reports have surfaced in the
    last several days  (tflink, 16:53:50)
  * new tb is needed for this to be fixed again  (tflink, 16:54:03)

* Open Floor  (tflink, 17:03:16)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004421#c3 not a
    blocker  (satellit_e, 17:04:29)
  * LINK: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_20#SoaS_f20-Alpha_TC5
    (satellit_e, 17:05:21)

Meeting ended at 17:18:50 UTC.




Action Items
------------





Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* tflink (138)
* kparal (57)
* jreznik (57)
* Viking-Ice (41)
* dan408 (30)
* pschindl (19)
* garretraziel (13)
* satellit_e (13)
* mkrizek (10)
* pwhalen (10)
* zodbot (4)
* nirik (1)
* roshi (1)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20130909/dd5d3907/attachment.sig>

More information about the test mailing list