Licensing? Was: Removing Optical Boot Requirement from F20 Alpha Release Requirements
redwolfe at gmail.com
Thu Sep 19 12:53:13 UTC 2013
On 09/19/2013 06:49 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 05:26:03 -0400 (EDT)
> Kamil Paral <kparal at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> 1) modify the alpha criterion so that it only requires optical
>>> media to work if the isos are correctly sized
>>> 2) require booting from optical media at beta when the isos are
>>> required to be properly sized
>> However, there's one corner case to consider. Due to some licensing
>> issues we still can't test UEFI in VMs. That means we can't really
>> test UEFI boot and installation of Live/DVD/netinst other than
>> burning it (or doing a USB conversion, but then we don't test the
>> vanilla ISO). If Live/netinst burning is broken for some reason
>> (other than being oversize, which is not very likely for these two
>> images), we might have troubles verifying that UEFI works. OTOH this
>> is a very unlikely situation to occur. I'm mentioning it for
> I know you mentioned it for completeness, just expanding on why I don't
> think it's a huge issue.
Am I being dense, or missing something?
What "licensing issues"?
I have a new Intel "Haswell" (i5-4430/z87) achitecture machine and do
both VM and bare-metal testing, is there something I should be aware of
and add tot the testing procedures?
More information about the test